What is the Lintner Model?

Why do so many companies raise dividends slowly—even when profits jump or fall sharply?

The Lintner Model helps answer that question. It explains why companies focus on steady, predictable dividend growth instead of changing payouts every time earnings move. Rather than reacting to short-term results, management sets long-term dividend targets and adjusts toward them gradually. The goal is simple: keep investors confident and avoid surprises.

For dividend investors, this matters. Understanding the Lintner Model makes it easier to see why stable payouts are often a deliberate choice, not a lack of growth. It also helps you judge whether a company’s dividend strategy is built for reliability—or risk.

What you’ll learn

• Origins
• Core Concept
• The Lintner Dividend Formula
• Assumptions Behind the Model
• Advantages
• Criticisms and Limitation
• Relevance to Dividend Investors
• Comparison with Other Dividend Theories
• Conclusion
• FAQs

Origins of the Lintner Model

John Lintner was an economist who wrote the 1956 paper, Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes, which outlined the behavior of corporations regarding dividends. He focused on the behavior of U.S. corporations and found that dividends are rarely changed based on changes in profits. Instead, companies alter their dividend payment over time to create predictability and stability for their shareholders.

Lintner used both quantitative data and interviews with corporate executives to provide insight into how executives view the payment of dividends. Executives tend to view dividends as a long-term commitment, whereas most consider them to be a short-term tool. In addition, companies were hesitant to raise dividend payments unless management was confident that a higher dividend could be continued, and they were particularly hesitant to decrease dividends because of the negative message that such an action would send to the market.

Lintner’s research changed the way in which dividend policy was understood. Instead of considering dividends to be a byproduct of profitability, dividends are now viewed as a strategic decision dependent on investor expectations and concerns about signaling. This insight has become the foundation for most modern dividend theories and has shaped subsequent models that include behavioral factors. To this day, the trend identified by Lintner remains true: companies smooth their dividends over time to ensure investor confidence and to minimize uncertainty.

Core Concept of the Model

The Lintner Model’s premise is that firms strive towards achieving a certain long-term target dividend payout ratio. Therefore, instead of increasing dividends through abrupt changes, the firm wishes to achieve its target ratio incrementally. Companies set a portion of their net earnings as dividends and only make incremental adjustments to dividends to guard against instability and preserve expectations. Firms are very cautious to increase dividends too quickly because they create expectations of future earnings that may not be met in the event of declining earnings.

A crucial feature of this model is that firms tend to exhibit a strong aversion to reducing dividends. Firms generally view the reduction of dividends as a negative signal, representing financial distress or uncertainty concerning future performance. Consequently, firms are more likely to utilize incremental changes in dividends corresponding to sustainable growth in earnings, which leads to the development of dividend smoothing, thereby helping maintain steady dividends over time, even during periods of fluctuating profits.

Ultimately, these actions indicate that dividend policy is influenced by more than just financially viable capacity. Management intent and communication play a substantial role in the dividend policy of the firm, and dividends can provide signals of management confidence and discipline. Dividend investors will find value in this notion, as this belief will underscore many firms’ emphasis on providing dividends continuously and gradually, which provides long-term certainty compared to short-term fluctuations in profit.

The Lintner Dividend Formula Explained

The Lintner Model can be summarized with a simple but effective formula:

Dₜ = Dₜ₋₁ + a + c(Eₜ − Dₜ₋₁)

The formula describes how firms gradually adjust their dividends over time. It explains the relationship between the current dividend per share (Dₜ), prior dividend (Dₜ₋₁) and current earnings (Eₜ), as well as the long-term change that management desires to make in dividends (a), and the firm’s ability to achieve the desired payout (c).

In reality, dividends do not immediately keep pace with changes in earnings. Rather than increasing payouts in line with profit growth, even as expectations build around earnings growth and potential Fed rate cuts driving the market higher next year, firms instead close the gap gradually between their current dividend and the dividend level implied by a target payout ratio. When earnings increase rapidly, companies typically raise dividends by only a portion of that increase, signaling management’s confidence in the sustainability of the growth.

In contrast, when earnings decline, management will frequently maintain or make minimal changes to their dividend to avoid creating the perception of a downturn in profitability.

The variable c plays a key role in the manner in which firms behave towards dividends. The level of c indicates how fast a firm intends to change its dividend. Higher c values indicate that the firm intends to change its dividend quickly, while lower values indicate that the firm is taking a more cautious approach. Therefore, for investors, this explains the smooth and predictable nature of dividend increases and the infrequent nature of sudden dividend decreases.

Key Assumptions Behind the Model

The Lintner Model has been developed based on a number of basic assumptions of how firms make decisions regarding dividends. First, it assumes that the firm management prefers a steady, predictable growth in their dividends, and they believe their dividend payments will fluctuate with their earnings. Therefore, company executives spend a great deal of time considering how dividends may appear to investors, and steadily increasing dividends is one way they can demonstrate financial discipline to investors. As a result, companies will often take a smooth dividend policy, even when there are short-term profit fluctuations.

Second, the Lintner Model assumes that investors pay close attention to dividends. Lintner found that dividend cuts are often interpreted as warning signals about a firm’s financial health or future prospects, a reaction clearly seen when Fiera tumbled following a 50% dividend cut. As a result, firms generally avoid reducing dividends unless absolutely necessary, while dividend increases tend to signal confidence in future earnings and are more likely to generate an immediate positive market response.

Third, the Lintner Model treats dividends as a vehicle for signalling. When a firm maintains or gradually increases its dividend payments, it signals to the market that it is confident in its long-term performance and future stability. This assumption, that companies establish dividend patterns to communicate corporate priorities, is particularly important to investors focused on income producing stocks. Firms that subscribe to this theory tend to emphasize trust, long-term stability, and sustainable income rather than short-term flexibility.

Advantages of the Lintner Approach

The Lintner Model is useful for understanding how companies actually manage dividends. The advantages of the model include its ability to describe the way in which most companies adjust their dividends gradually and systematically. Rather than reacting to short-term earnings fluctuations, dividend decisions are typically based on long-term profit trends, such as strategic plans that target sustained margin improvement, including Hugo Boss aiming for a long-term 12% operating profit margin. Therefore, the Lintner Model is of value to analysts and investors looking to predict future dividend changes based on firms’ previous performance.

The Lintner Model’s advantages include its ability to clearly convey the concept of dividend smoothing. Many companies seek to keep dividend payouts constant even though earnings may fluctuate from period to period. The Lintner Model’s emphasis on incremental dividend adjustments helps to minimize the volatility of payouts and maintain investor confidence. This mirrors how companies make decisions at the board level, where management has to strike a balance between rewarding investors and preserving cash and financial flexibility.

Lastly, the Lintner Model clarifies the signaling effect of dividends. Companies that provide stable or gradually increasing dividend payments signal strength and confidence in their future earnings. By framing dividend policy as both a financial and communication strategy, the Lintner Model offers deeper insight into why firms take a conservative approach to payouts, even when headline dividend yield levels fluctuate. For dividend investors, this reinforces the preference for companies that follow Lintner-like behavior, as they tend to deliver more consistent returns over the long term.

Criticisms and Limitation

The Lintner Model is a foundational theory in dividend policy, but it has clear limitations. One issue is its simplified view of dividend decisions, which assumes stable earnings and a target payout ratio as the main drivers of payouts. In reality, dividends are shaped by a wider set of constraints, including cash flow pressure, debt burdens, and shifts in the broader financial environment—factors increasingly visible as more borrowers turn to bankruptcy to shed debt obligations. These conditions help explain why dividend behavior often deviates from the smooth adjustment process implied by the model.

Another limitation of the Lintner Model is that it does not address the increasing popularity of repurchase methods for returning cash to shareholders. When Lintner created the model in the early 1950s, repurchase transactions were infrequent and therefore, not accounted for within the Model. Thus, the Lintner Model is less likely to accurately reflect the number of capital distributions made by public corporations today. In addition, the Lintner Model does not take into account taxation issues that may significantly influence both an organization’s capital distribution policies and an investor’s preferred form of capital return.

In addressing how the Lintner Model does not capture the behavior of rapidly changing businesses or global capital markets, the Lintner Model does provide an excellent benchmark from which to derive an explanation as to why an organization’s focus on its dividend payments will be characterized by long-term dividend stability, a view often echoed by reputable stock advisory services, even when it may be impractical for that organization to pay dividends based on the assumptions contained within the Lintner Model.

Relevance to Dividend Investors Today

The Lintner Model is an extremely useful model for dividend investors. The model provides an essential process to determine if a company’s dividend is reliable and sustainable. With the model’s emphasis on providing gradual movement to achieve a target payout ratio, it helps find companies that focus on achieving long-term stability rather than companies with high earnings volatility in the short-term. Companies that consistently increase their dividends in a steady manner—even during uncertain economic times—demonstrate management discipline and prudence in managing expectations.

Additionally, this model helps to better understand management’s intent. A company that has a history of steady dividend growth signals confidence in its future earnings and a commitment to maintaining payouts through difficult periods, a pattern often highlighted by top rated financial newsletters. On the other hand, companies with inconsistent dividend histories or sudden dividend cuts tend to signal weaker planning or greater reliance on short-term earnings results.

In an environment where stock buybacks and special dividends can dilute the quality of core dividend payments, including situations where companies pursue large repurchase programs such as Indeed’s owner embarking on a fresh $1.7 billion share buyback, the Lintner Model encourages investors to focus on the consistency of dividend growth rather than headline yield alone. Companies that display Lintner-like characteristics by delivering regular, sustainable dividend increases tend to build trust with investors and attract long-term, income-oriented capital. As a result, the model remains a practical tool for evaluating dividend reliability and portfolio suitability when income dependability matters most.

Comparison with Other Dividend Theories

Lintner’s Model is an innovative model that offers a new view on how companies manage their dividend payments. The Lintner Model is unique because it emphasizes the behavior of managers rather than how investors interpret dividend payments. In other words, the Lintner Model provides a framework for understanding the internal managerial processes of companies when deciding about dividend payments. For example, Lintner found that while companies strive to have a long-term payout ratio, they do not make dividend changes immediately after a change in earnings; rather, they are gradual to adjust in relation to consistency.

The Bird-in-the-Hand Theory asserts that investors value dividends because they provide an immediate lower risk return. The Dividend Irrelevance Theory states that the dividend policy will not affect the valuation of a company in an idealized market. The Lintner Model does not seek to resolve this ongoing debate. Instead, it illustrates how dividends are determined in the ‘real-world’ marketplace, where market uncertainties, reputational factors, and signalling are all critical factors.

The Lintner Model represents an important conceptual development by demonstrating how management behavior affects dividend payment stability. It helps explain why dividend changes are typically gradual and why companies generally avoid cuts, given the potential damage to credibility and investor trust, as seen when FMC slashed its dividend and the stock was nearly cut in half. By linking dividend policy to management credibility, the model highlights how payout decisions influence long-term relationships with investors and, ultimately, a company’s value and continued growth.

Conclusion

The Lintner Model provides one of the most important frameworks for understanding how firms manage their dividend policies through gradual or predictable adjustments toward an established target dividend payout ratio. In addition to helping explain why companies typically do not make abrupt or extreme changes to their dividend policies, it also provides a clear rationale for companies to pursue a systematic and predictable approach to dividend growth over time.

Investors can therefore evaluate companies as more reliable sources of dividends using the Lintner Model as a reference point, since firms that exhibit a Lintner-like dividend policy will consistently provide investors with incremental or consistent increases in their dividends over time, demonstrating the firm’s discipline regarding managing its dividends as well as its confidence in its ability to grow its future earnings.

The ongoing importance of the Lintner Model has been demonstrated by its use by many investors today in assessing the reliability of dividends from various companies. Its emphasis on stability of dividend payments helps assure investors of their continued confidence in their investments and to build long-term wealth through the accumulation of dividends.

About the author

Tim Fries

LinkedIn Email

Tim Fries is the cofounder of The Tokenist. He has a B. Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, and an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Tim served as a Senior Associate on the investment team at RW Baird's US Private Equity division, and is also the co-founder of Protective Technologies Capital, an investment firm specializing in sensing, protection and control solutions.