Here’s the Only EV Stock Worth Looking at Right Now
Electric Vehicle (EV) stocks are all the hype right now. But does it make sense for Tesla stock, a luxury EV company, to rise by 600% during a global pandemic with record unemployment numbers? Likewise, Workhorse Group Inc. jumped by 800% without producing material results in the form of mass production of EVs. Can we trust such wishful thinking which suggests the EV boom will never end?
When Electric Vehicles Became Attractive
From kindergarten, children are taught to form an eco-friendly mindset: recycle, don’t waste water, use public transportation and car-sharing, don’t waste food. Because of this mindset, the younger generations are always eager to push for eco-friendly policies and products. When it comes to electric vehicles (EVs), this is further spurred by government subsidies and eco-status signaling.
Under the guidance of an accomplished South African (he actually has passports from South Africa, Canada, and the US) entrepreneur Elon Musk, Tesla broke the first psychological barrier – making EVs look like sleek, elegant luxury cars instead of something out of an awkward sci-fi movie, although even they can serve a niche. As a result, Tesla has strengthened not just its stock, but a number of other EV stocks as well.
By breaking this stifling barrier, Tesla has accrued a cult following at the cost of making EVs beyond the reach of most people. With the most generous subsidies of your state/country, you will be hard-pressed to buy the cheapest Tesla car – Model 3 Standard Range Plus – under $38k. Model 3 was supposed to be Tesla’s first affordable car at $35k, which would still be considered a luxury sedan.
The Clash Between Wishful Thinking and EV Reality
Chasing the goal of affordability and sustainability is the main driver behind the EV sector. By holding 18% of the global EV market share, and 81.66% of the US EV market share, Tesla became a comparison baseline for other EV companies. The second-largest EV manufacturer is Volkswagen at 6%, closely followed by BYD and BMW. Even an accomplished EV company like Nissan only holds 2% of the global EV market share, despite offering the cheapest EV you can own.
This tells us that the EV sector is all about postponing the resolution of hard barriers:
- High cost, on average 3x more than gasoline-powered cars, despite all the subsidies you can think of.
- High cost resulting from a hard barrier – battery technology. Despite incremental increases in battery efficiency, the cost of strip-mining lithium, battery longevity, and energy density still fail far behind gasoline in terms of cost-effectiveness.
- Sparse charging infrastructure – even the most developed cities around the world have few fast-charging stations, let alone non-urbanized areas.
Moreover, even in 2019, consumers buying used cars over new cars achieved a record. Used cars accounted for 62% of prime and 45% of super-prime loans. In 2020, after the government devasted the average buying power as it responded to a virus (0.02% fatality under 50), the used car market broke even that high ceiling. Unfortunately, things are not equal between used EVs and used regular cars.
Given that batteries are their most vital component, it would cost you between $3,000 and $7,000 to replace Model S batteries, representing yet another hard barrier. Solid-state batteries may become a solution with prolonged longevity and twice as much energy density, but this is yet another potential avenue for the future.
Are There Any Grounded EV Stocks?
As you can see, the EV sector is operating within a space in which people want EVs to be affordable, look good, and be eco-friendly, but few, if any, are. On the other hand, EVs are experientially more pleasing; they produce almost no noise and eliminate smog completely. More importantly, EVs assuage the mind steeped in a desire to be conscientious from an early age.
After all, if we had invested in EVs as much as we’ve invested in the oil industry, who is to say that we already wouldn’t be at the stage in which you can have a $15k EV with a 500-mile range? Further pushed by institutional incentives, these are the considerations that are here to stay.
In the meantime, one should avoid EV bubbles. Specifically, Tesla-type bubbles in which an EV company is valued as a tech company. Nikola, Nio, and Workhorse follow similar patterns of over-valuation when you look at their price-to-earnings reports.
There’s one exception to this pattern: General Motors.
General Motors (NASDAQ:GM)
Seeing the writing on the wall when it comes to institutional incentives and possible battery revolution, GM made a serious move by setting aside $25 billion for EVs in the next five years. For comparison, Tesla’s R&D budget was $1.34 billion in 2019. Over that five-year period, GM is set to launch 30 EV models, of which ¾ will be exclusive to the US.
As you would expect, the success of this ambitious transition into EVs depends on their core feature – battery type. It seems that GM is confident enough that its Ultium battery tech will do the job, as it has already reduced battery cost by 40% compared to Chevy Bolt.
Moreover, the new generation of cars is not just about not using gasoline, but having the potential to be driverless. Although Tesla scored highly in this area, GM’s Super Cruise auto-pilot system outperformed Tesla in key safety areas. On top of all that, GM is actually a profitable car company instead of floating on the dreams of what-could-be.
Therefore, if you are a fan of EVs, GM stock is worthy of consideration. It may not be as exotic or inferring a high-social status as Tesla, but given GM’s profit trajectory, ask yourself: which EV company stands to gain in the long-run?
What is the realistic price tag that would make you not hesitate to buy an electric car? Let us know in the comments below.
Disclosure: Tim Fries has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned, and has no plans to initiate any positions within the 72 hours following the publishing of this article. This article expresses the opinions of Tim Fries. Tokenist Media LLC has no position in any of the stocks mentioned, and does not plan to initiate any positions within 72 hours of the publishing of this article. Please consult our website policy for more information.